Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement using three different resin adhesives vs. glass-ionomer based adhesive

Sadeghi, Mostafa and Atafat, Mohammad and Abbasi, Mehdi (2015) Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite to resin-modified glass-ionomer cement using three different resin adhesives vs. glass-ionomer based adhesive. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques, 4 (4). pp. 153-160.

[img]
Preview
Text
JDMT_Volume 4_Issue 4_Pages 153-160.pdf

Download (310kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/article_5173.html

Abstract

Background: The clinical success of sandwich technique depends on the strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) bonding to both dentin and resin composite. Therefore, the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite bonded to RMGIC utilizing different resin adhesives versus a GIC-based adhesive was compared. Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 84 holes (5×2 mm) were prepared in acrylic blocks, randomly divided into seven groups (n=12) and filled with RMGIC (Light-Cured Universal Restorative, GC). In the Group I; no adhesive was applied on the RMGIC. In the Group II, non-etched and Group III was etched with phosphoric acid. In groups II and III, after rinsing, etch-and-rinse adhesive (OptiBond Solo Plus); in the Group IV; a two-step self-etch adhesive (OptiBond XTR) and in Group V; a one-step self-etch (OptiBond All-in-One) were applied on the cement surfaces. Group VI; a GIC-based adhesive (Fuji Bond LC) was painted over the cement surface and cured. Group VII; the GIC-based adhesive was brushed over RMGIC followed by the placement of resin composite and co-cured. Afterward; resin composite (Point 4) cylinders were placed on the treated cement surfaces. The specimens were placed in 100 humidity at 37 ± 1°C and thermo cycled. The shear bond test was performed at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min and calculated in MPa; the specimens were examined to determine mode of failure. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Results: The maximum (24.62±3.70 MPa) and minimum (18.15±3.38 MPa) SBS mean values were recorded for OptiBond XTR adhesive and the control group, respectively. The pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences between the groups that bonded with different adhesives. The adhesive failure was the most common failure mode observed. Conclusion: This study suggests that GIC-based adhesive could be applied over RMGIC as co-cure technique for sandwich restorations in lieu of employing the resin adhesives

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WU Dentistry. Oral surgery
Divisions: Journals > J Dental Materials and Techniques
Depositing User: jdmt jdmt
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2017 15:15
Last Modified: 21 Sep 2017 15:15
URI: http://eprints.mums.ac.ir/id/eprint/2279

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item