The effect of three different amalgam surface treatment methods on composite- amalgam fracture strength

Sarabi, Nasrin and Moosavi, Hourieh (2006) The effect of three different amalgam surface treatment methods on composite- amalgam fracture strength. Journal of Mashhad Dental School, 30 (Issue). pp. 71-78.

[img]
Preview
Text
JMDS_Volume 30_Issue شماره 1,2_Pages 71-78.pdf

Download (334kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_1458.html

Abstract

Introduction: Following increasing people’s demand for having aesthetic, functional and simultaneous benefits of composite and amalgam restorations, combined restoration of composite-amalgam has been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of there methods of surface treatment on composite-amalgam fracture strength. Materials & Methods: In this experimental invitro study, on thirty uniform and sound human maxillary premolar teeth mesiobuccal class II cavities were prepared so that in all specimens the thickness of buccal reminder enamel was one millimeter. They were divided randomly into three groups of ten and filled with amalgam. After 24h in each tooth, thin mesiobuccal enamel was removed and amalgam surface were veneered with Tetric Ceram composite by one of the three following methods. In A and B groups after etching with phosphoric acid, Scotchbond Multi-purpose and One Coat Bond were applied respectively. In group C after sandblasting and acid etching, margin bond unfilled resin was applied for adhesion of composite to amalgam. Finally for fracture strength measurement, the specimens were loaded under Instron testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min with 450 angle. Fracture areas were also considered from stand point of CEJ location and type of debonding (adhesive – cohesive – mixed). Data were analyzed with One Way ANOVA and Duncan tests. Results: Mean fracture strengths in three methods were significantly different (P=0.02). Group C had the highest and group B had the lowest fracture strength. In all three groups, the most common type of debonding was adhesive and above to the CEJ. Conclusion: The highest mean value of fracture strength was obtained in group with amalgam sandblasting followed by application of unfilled resin which did not differ significantly with Scotchbond Multi-purpose group. However it differed significantly with One Coat Bond group. Key words: amalgam veneering, fracture strength, adhesive system, sandblasting.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: WU Dentistry. Oral surgery
Divisions: Journals > Journal of Mashhad Dental School
Depositing User: jmds jmds
Date Deposited: 24 Sep 2017 17:38
Last Modified: 24 Sep 2017 17:38
URI: http://eprints.mums.ac.ir/id/eprint/3659

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item